Network Protection Services

Secure the hybrid network your business actually runs on.

End-to-end protection for hybrid IT and OT network infrastructure. Architecture review, segmentation, threat detection, and response capability designed to keep operations running and reduce the impact of future cyber attacks. Aligned with NIST CSF, ISA/IEC 62443, the Purdue Model, and regulatory guidance for critical infrastructure.

Network protection across IT, OT, and everything between.

Most organizations have a network architecture diagram that hasn't been validated in years. New devices have been added, cloud workloads have changed how traffic flows, OT and ICS environments have crept onto the corporate network, and remote access pathways have multiplied. The documentation describes a network that may no longer exist. When an incident happens, response teams discover the gap between what was supposed to be in place and what actually is, usually under the worst possible conditions.

Armour Cybersecurity's Network Protection services close that gap. The engagement validates and documents the current state of the network across IT and OT environments, identifies architectural and operational weaknesses, builds a future-state design grounded in segmentation and zoning principles, and produces a prioritized remediation roadmap. Where OT or ICS environments are in scope, the methodology follows ISA/IEC 62443 zone-and-conduit principles, the Purdue Model, and NIST SP 800-82 guidance.

The work is technology-agnostic. Tools are selected based on the environment, not vendor relationships. All OT assessment activity is non-intrusive, using manual configuration review, walkthrough inspection, and protocol-aware tooling vetted for industrial environments. The objective is a network that is documented, segmented, monitored, and resilient under both routine operations and active attack.

IT + OT
Hybrid coverage across corporate networks, cloud connectivity, remote access, identity infrastructure, and OT or ICS environments
12-14 wk
Standard engagement timeline across three phases: discovery, architecture assessment with risk analysis, reporting and roadmap

A network nobody fully maps vs. an architecture that holds.

The difference between organizations that contain incidents quickly and those that watch them spread is almost always about how clearly the network is documented, segmented, and monitored when the first alert fires.

The Problem

Architecture diagrams that don't match reality. Segmentation that exists on paper, not in production.

OT environments are connected to corporate networks through pathways that were supposed to be temporary. Vendor remote access has accumulated over years with no central registry. Flat networks let lateral movement happen unimpeded. Legacy systems remain exposed because nobody owns them. Firewall rules have grown into hundreds of entries nobody can audit. When the next attack lands, the response team works from documentation that describes a previous version of the network, while the actual environment surfaces new pathways the attacker is already using.

The Solution

Validated architecture, enforced segmentation, monitored traffic, and a roadmap sequenced by risk.

The engagement validates the current state of the network against actual infrastructure, not outdated documentation. Segmentation and zoning are designed using ISA/IEC 62443 and the Purdue Model where OT is involved, with concrete enforcement at firewall, VLAN, and access control layers. Remote access is consolidated and hardened. Threat monitoring is extended across the network. The roadmap sequences quick wins (blocking exposed services, enforcing MFA) alongside longer-term initiatives (network redesign, vendor risk controls, policy alignment) so the team knows exactly what to address first.

What the engagement covers.

Nine integrated domains across the network protection lifecycle, calibrated to whether the organization runs primarily IT, a hybrid IT/OT estate, or critical infrastructure subject to sector-specific regulation.

01 / ARCHITECTURE

Network Architecture Review

Validation of current network topology against actual infrastructure, mapping of communication patterns and control flows, identification of legacy systems and architectural weaknesses, and design of future-state architecture aligned with industry standards.

02 / SEGMENTATION

Segmentation & Zoning

Zone and conduit design using ISA/IEC 62443 principles for OT and the Purdue Model where applicable. Validation of VLAN tagging, firewall zoning, ACL configurations, and jump host segmentation for both IT and OT environments.

03 / PERIMETER

Firewall, IDS & IPS Configuration

Configuration review of firewalls, routers, and IDS/IPS deployments to identify misconfigurations, enhance perimeter security, and optimize rule sets for performance and clarity over years of accumulated changes.

04 / REMOTE ACCESS

Remote Access & VPN Security

Assessment of remote access pathways including vendor access, VPN configurations, and interconnections with corporate IT systems, with evaluation of multi-factor authentication, session logging, and session restriction controls.

05 / OT & ICS

OT & ICS Protection

Specialized assessment and protection of OT and ICS environments including SCADA, PLCs, HMIs, historians, and engineering workstations. Non-intrusive methodology aligned with ISA/IEC 62443, Purdue Model, and NIST SP 800-82.

06 / IDENTITY

Identity & Privileged Access

Review of identity and privileged access management across the network layer, including MFA practices, account lifecycle, least-privilege enforcement, and segregation of duties for accounts with cross-network reach.

07 / VULNERABILITY

Vulnerability & Patch Management

Identification of network device vulnerabilities, firmware versions, exposed services, and weak credentials, with patch management process review and recommendations tailored to the constraints of each environment.

08 / MONITORING

Network Threat Monitoring

Capability assessment for network traffic monitoring, SIEM integration, anomaly detection, and threat intelligence consumption. Recommendations to extend detection coverage across both IT and OT segments.

09 / INCIDENT RESPONSE

Incident Response & Forensics

Network incident response readiness, integration of network telemetry with IR processes, forensic capability for network-layer investigation, and tabletop validation of response procedures across IT and OT scenarios.

Who this engagement serves.

Built for organizations that depend on network availability for business operations, regulatory compliance, or public safety, and that need an architecture that holds under both routine operations and active attack.

Critical Infrastructure & Utilities

Water, wastewater, energy, transportation, and other utility operators subject to EPA, DHS CISA, NERC CIP, and sector-specific guidance with OT and ICS environments requiring specialized protection.

Manufacturing & Industrial Organizations

Manufacturers, processing plants, and industrial operators with mixed IT/OT environments, vendor remote access requirements, and operational continuity demands that make uptime non-negotiable.

Regulated Industries & Financial Services

Finance, healthcare, legal, government, and other regulated organizations whose internal networks support sensitive workloads and where segmentation, monitoring, and audit-ready evidence are core requirements.

Enterprises with Hybrid Cloud + On-Premises Estates

Organizations operating across on-premises networks, hyperscaler clouds, and remote workforces, with network architectures that have grown organically and now need consolidated review and forward-looking design.

A disciplined methodology across six phases.

The engagement runs twelve to fourteen weeks across three structured phases, with six execution phases inside them. Each phase has defined inputs, outputs, and acceptance criteria. Ongoing managed monitoring continues after the engagement closes if engaged on retainer.

1

Discovery & Documentation

Formal kickoff with technical and operational leadership. Review of current logical and physical network architecture across IT and OT environments. Validation of documentation, asset inventories, vendor access logs, and existing security policies.

2

Architecture Assessment

Validation of current-state architecture against actual infrastructure, mapping of zones and conduits where OT is in scope, assessment of segmentation enforcement, remote access pathways, and interconnections between IT and OT environments.

3

Risk & Gap Analysis

Identification of vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, and architectural weaknesses. Threat landscape overview specific to the sector. Risk matrix quantified using likelihood and impact criteria with CVSS v3.1 scoring where applicable.

4

Roadmap Development

Prioritized remediation roadmap distinguishing short-term tactical fixes, medium-term initiatives, and long-term strategic projects. Future-state architecture diagrams showing improved segmentation and security control zones.

5

Implementation Support

Optional execution support on the highest-priority remediation items: segmentation enforcement, firewall rule cleanup, remote access consolidation, MFA expansion, monitoring extension, and network device hardening.

6

Continuous Monitoring & Improvement

Optional ongoing managed services covering network threat monitoring, periodic architecture reviews as the environment evolves, and integration with incident response readiness and tabletop exercise programs.

What the organization walks away with.

Nine integrated deliverables that together form a working network protection baseline. Every artifact is structured to support audit evidence, board reporting, and direct execution by internal engineering and operations teams.

DELIVERABLE 01

Network Architecture Assessment Report

Comprehensive report covering current-state architecture, identified weaknesses, compliance gaps, and operational risks across the IT and OT environments in scope, with prioritized recommendations and budgetary guidance.

DELIVERABLE 02

Current-State Network Diagrams

Validated logical and physical architecture diagrams updated against actual infrastructure, capturing zones, conduits, segmentation enforcement, and the interconnections between IT and OT where applicable.

DELIVERABLE 03

Future-State Architecture Diagrams

Proposed future-state architecture showing improved zone boundaries, segmentation enforcement, firewall placement, remote access segregation, and logging improvements aligned with industry frameworks.

DELIVERABLE 04

Risk Matrix (Likelihood ร— Impact)

Consolidated risk matrix rating each finding using likelihood and impact criteria, incorporating CVSS v3.1 scoring and qualitative analysis aligned with operational risk and availability requirements.

DELIVERABLE 05

Compliance Review Matrix

Mapping of findings against applicable regulatory and framework expectations including NIST CSF, ISA/IEC 62443, EPA, DHS CISA, NERC CIP, PIPEDA, HIPAA, and PCI DSS where relevant to the organization.

DELIVERABLE 06

Prioritized Remediation Roadmap

Sequenced remediation plan categorized into short-term tactical fixes, medium-term initiatives, and long-term strategic projects, with effort estimates, risk reduction mapping, and quick-win versus high-effort designations.

DELIVERABLE 07

Segmentation & Zoning Model

Documented segmentation and zoning model aligned with ISA/IEC 62443 zone-and-conduit principles for OT and corporate segmentation patterns for IT, with concrete enforcement points at the firewall and VLAN layers.

DELIVERABLE 08

Network Security Control Inventory

Inventory of firewalls, VLAN assignments, IDS/IPS deployments, ACLs, authentication gateways, and remote access methods, with operational concerns, configuration drift, and documentation weaknesses surfaced.

DELIVERABLE 09

Executive Summary Presentation

Board-ready presentation deck tailored separately for executive leadership (top risks, public service impact, roadmap) and operational and technical teams (vulnerabilities, architecture inconsistencies, remediation tactics).

The numbers behind the work.

Founded by military intelligence veterans with senior advisors from PwC, KPMG, Deloitte, EY, and Mandiant. The track record reflects the discipline.

260+

Clients Served

Organizations across finance, healthcare, technology, energy, legal, and government trust Armour Cybersecurity to protect what matters.

97%

Client Retention Rate

Long-term engagements built on consistent quality, predictable delivery, and consulting relationships that compound in value over time.

52+

Industries ยท Worldwide Reach

Cross-sector experience spanning every major regulated industry, with operations supporting clients across North America, Latin America, and beyond.

80+

Cybersecurity Technology Solutions

A vetted catalogue of technology partnerships and proprietary methods deployed in support of network architecture review, OT and ICS protection, segmentation design, and managed network monitoring.

Build the network you can defend, not the one you've inherited.

Schedule a fifteen-minute discovery call to scope the engagement. Protecting What Matters starts with knowing exactly what is connected to what.

Book Discovery Call

Frequently asked questions.

Common questions from CISOs, network architects, plant operations leaders, and compliance owners evaluating a Network Protection engagement.

How is this different from generic IT security or a vulnerability assessment?
Network Protection is the architectural and operational layer that sits underneath every other security control. A vulnerability assessment finds weaknesses; network protection makes sure the architecture, segmentation, and operating model that contain those weaknesses are designed to hold. The engagement covers the full hybrid network: corporate IT, cloud connectivity, remote access, identity infrastructure, and OT or ICS environments where relevant. The deliverable is a working architecture, not just a list of findings.
Do you support OT and ICS environments as well as IT networks?
Yes. The methodology covers both IT and OT/ICS environments, including SCADA, PLCs, HMIs, historians, engineering workstations, and the supporting network infrastructure that connects them. OT assessments follow ISA/IEC 62443 zone-and-conduit principles, the Purdue Model, and NIST SP 800-82 guidance. All OT assessment activity is non-intrusive: no active or unauthenticated scanning of sensitive control assets that could risk downtime. Manual configuration review, walkthrough inspection, and protocol-aware tooling are used instead.
How long does a Network Protection engagement take?
A standard engagement runs twelve to fourteen weeks across three structured phases: kickoff and environment discovery (weeks one through three), architecture assessment and risk analysis (weeks three through twelve), and reporting with roadmap development and final presentations (weeks twelve through fourteen). Smaller, IT-only environments scale down; multi-site or multi-plant OT engagements scale up. Ongoing monitoring and incident response coverage continue after the engagement closes if engaged on retainer.
Which frameworks and standards inform the methodology?
ISA/IEC 62443 (system security requirements and security levels for industrial automation), the Purdue Enterprise Reference Architecture, NIST Cybersecurity Framework, NIST SP 800-82 (Guide to Industrial Control System Security), CIS Benchmarks for network configuration hardening, and sector-specific guidance where applicable: EPA Cybersecurity Best Practices for Water Systems, DHS CISA advisories for critical infrastructure, NERC CIP for energy utilities, and PIPEDA, HIPAA, PCI DSS, and GDPR for regulatory compliance.
What is included in the architecture review?
Documentation of the current network topology across IT and OT environments, validation of zone segmentation and conduit enforcement, mapping of communication patterns and control flows, assessment of remote access pathways including vendor access and VPN configurations, review of firewall rule sets and IDS/IPS deployments, identification of legacy systems and architectural weaknesses, and current-state network diagrams (updated against actual infrastructure rather than outdated documentation). A future-state architecture diagram and segmentation model are produced as part of the roadmap.
How do you handle vulnerability scanning in OT environments without causing downtime?
Active or unauthenticated vulnerability scanning is never performed against sensitive OT assets where it could risk device instability or operational disruption. The methodology uses non-intrusive techniques: manual configuration review, walkthrough inspection, passive traffic observation, protocol-aware tooling vetted for industrial environments, and authenticated review against safe targets. All tools and methods are validated with the technical team before deployment. The result is meaningful risk identification without compromising uptime in mission-critical environments.
How does Network Protection relate to your other services?
Network Protection establishes the architectural foundation. Vulnerability Assessment finds the weaknesses within it. Managed SOC monitors it continuously. Incident Response engages when something gets through. Cloud Security extends the same operating model into hyperscaler environments. Many organizations engage Network Protection first to establish the baseline, then layer the other services on top. The same team operates across all of them, so context and chain of custody are preserved.

Secure the network your business depends on.

Reach out to scope a Network Protection engagement. Discovery calls are scheduled within two business days.

Talk to Armour Cybersecurity.

๐Ÿ“ž
Phone
1 866 80 30 700
โœ‰
Email
info@armourcyber.io
๐Ÿ“
Headquarters
77 Bloor St West, Suite 600
Toronto, ON, Canada

Request a discovery call.

Tell us about your network environment, whether OT or ICS systems are in scope, and what success looks like. A senior advisor will respond within two business days.

By submitting, you agree to be contacted by Armour Cybersecurity. We respect your privacy and never share contact information.